Allowed
The State of Maharashtra v. Maruti Vitthal Mahadik and Another
Bombay HCAPPLN/3270/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
crapl 3270.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
919 crapl 3270.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3270 OF 2013 IN APPEAL STAMP NO. 261/2013
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS MARUTI VITTHAL MAHADIK AND ANOTHER
APP for Applicant : Mr. S.D. Kaldate
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 13TH JANUARY, 2015.
PER COURT:
1] Heard. Perused the cause disclosed in the petition. Sufficient
cause has been disclosed. Application stands allowed.
[A.M. BADAR] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
The State of Maharashtra
Maruti Vitthal Mahadik and Another
S.S. Shinde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court