Allowed

Shaikh Javed S/O Shaikh Hussain v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC13 Oct 2015APPLN/4466/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal appeal for regular bail, the High Court allowed the release of the applicant, Shaikh Javed, who was accused of a murder offence. The court noted no distinguishing evidence against him compared to other already-released co-accused.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on regular bail upon executing a Personal Bond of Rs.30,000/- with one solvent surety in the like amount.

Shaikh Javed S/O Shaikh Hussain Vs the State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

Cri.Appln.No.4466/2015

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4466 OF 2015

¶5

Shaikh Javed s/o Shaikh Hussain, Age 35 years, Occu. Labour, R/o Mahur, Taluka Mahur, District Nanded

¶6

..Applicant

¶7

Versus The State of Maharashtra, through the Investigation Officer, Police Station, Mahur, Taluka Mahur, District Nanded

¶8

..Respondent

¶9

Mr J.M. Murkute, Advocate for applicant Mr R.B. Bagul, A.P.P. for respondent

¶10

CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

¶11

DATE : 13^th October 2015

¶12

PER COURT

¶13

Heard.

¶14

The applicant herein is seeking regular bail in Crime No.I63/2014 registered on 11^th September 2014 at Mahur Police Station, District Nanded for offences punishable under Section 302, 109, 120(B), 211, 201 read with Sec.34 of the Indian Penal Code,

¶15

Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is entitled for bail on parity with the other accused persons, who are already released on bail by order dated 27^th April 2015 passed in Criminal Application No.2016 and 1927 of 2015, on 7^th June 2015 in Criminal Application No.2791 of 2015, on 7^th July 2015 passed in Criminal Application No.3160 of 2015 and on 16^th July 2015 passed in Criminal Application No.3208 of 2015.

¶16

Cri.Appln.No.4466/2015

¶17

¶18

The application for grant of regular bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. on the ground that the applicant was the mastermind of the events which has resulted into registration of crime and according to him, the rest of the accused persons, who are released on bail were working under the control of present applicant. He would urge that there is direct evidence available against the present applicant and has prayed for rejection of the application.

¶19

I have perused the charge-sheet, so also the other documents opposing the bail application. It is not in dispute that the applicant by using Mobile No.9527963095 has used his mobile for being in touch with the other accused persons.

¶20

The said aspect is already dealt with by this Court while deciding the earlier bail applications.

¶21

Apart from above, there is no other evidence available on record or at least brought to my notice so as to distinguish this case from other case. In view thereof, it would be appropriate, in my opinion to order release of the applicant. Hence, I proceed to pass the following order.

¶22

(I) Applicant - Shaikh Javed s/o Shaikh Hussain shall be released on regular bail upon executing P.R. Bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rs. Thirty thousand) with one solvent surety in the like amount, in connection with Crime No. 63/2014 registered on 11^th September 2014 at Mahur Police Station, District Nanded for offences punishable under Section 302, 109, 120(B), 211, 201 read with Sec.34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶23

Cri.Appln.No.4466/2015

¶24

¶25

(ii) Bail before trial Court.

¶26

(iii) The applicant shall attend the Police Station, Mahur District Nanded once in a week, preferably on every Sunday and shall remain

¶27

present in Police Station between 3.00 p.m. and 4.00 p.m.

¶28

(iv) Criminal Application stands allowed in above terms.

¶29

( N.W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶30

vvr

Shaikh Javed S/O Shaikh Hussain v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaikh Javed S/O Shaikh Hussain v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dnyaneshwar Kailash Sutar Vs Seema W/O Dnyaneshwar Sutar and Another

Shaikh Afsar S/O Shaikh Magan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Kiran Sukhdeo Pattekar and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra.

National Insurance Co. Ltd., Gondia through Branch Manager Vs Ku. Seema D/O Bandu Ghawade, Minor through Natural Guardian Father, Bandu T. Ghawade and 2 Others

The Provident Fund Inspector, Jalgaon Vs M/S. Nagaon Education Society Gangamai Polytechnic College, Nagaon Dist. Dhule

Ramdas @ Ramkishan S/O Nagnath Hulgunde Vs the State of Maharashtra