Criminal Application filed by accused for bail in a case involving offences under IPC and SC/ST Act. Court rejected bail application, holding that medical evidence and direct accusations prima facie depict involvement and no case for bail is made out.
Application for bail stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cri.Appln.No.4443/2015
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4443 OF 2015
Ramdas @ Ramkishan s/o Nagnath Hulgunde
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
..Applicant ..Respondent
Mr S.P. Joshi, Advocate for applicant Mr A.P. Basarkar, A.P.P. for respondent
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 13th October 2015
PER COURT
Cri.Appln.No.4443/2015
2
( N.W. SAMBRE, J.)
vvr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant accused of offences under sections 323, 376, 452, 506 of the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramdas @ Ramkishan s/o Nagnath Hulgunde
The State of Maharashtra
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
