The High Court bench found the trial court's findings sustainable based on dying declarations and rejected the appeal. The matter was remanded to the Sessions Judge to prepare the paper book within four months.
Application rejected; record sent to Sessions Judge for paper book preparation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4009.15Criappln
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4009 OF 2015 IN APEAL/560/2015 WITH APEAL/560/2015
DINESH ARJUNSINGH THAKUR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kolhare S.R. APP for Respondent/State : Mr. A.V. Deshmukh
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. Dated: August 20, 2015
PER COURT :-
Heard.
4009.15Criappln
2
Sessions Judge-4, Aurangabad. Upon receiving the original record and proceedings by the Registry of Sessions Court, the Registry of concerned Court shall prepare the paper book and send it back along with original record and proceedings, as expeditiously as possible, however in any case within four months from today.
( A.M. BADAR, J. )
( S.S. SHINDE, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the trial court's judgment should be allowed or rejected.
DINESH ARJUNSINGH THAKUR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
