The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, refused to vacate an interim relief in a criminal writ petition and disposed of the application accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) Cri. Appln. No. 342 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Criminal Application No. 342 of 2015 (In Criminal Writ Petition No. 807 of 2011)
The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Inspector, Sillod City Police Station, .. Applicant Taluka : Sillod, (Original District : Aurangabad. respondent no.2)
versus
Dr. Govindsingh s/o. Fulchand Rajput .. Non-applicants & 2 others. (Nos.1 & 2 - Original petitioners & No.3 - Original respondent no.1)
Mr. S.G. Karlekar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the applicant - State.
Mr. D.P. Palodkar, Advocate, for non-applicant nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY 2015
PER COURT :
(2) Cri. Appln. No. 342 of 2015
( A.M. BADAR ) ( S.S. SHINDE )
JUDGE JUDGE
puranik / CRIAPPLN342.15
The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Inspector, Sillod City Police Station
Dr. Govindsingh s/o. Fulchand Rajput
S.S. Shinde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
