This single judge judgment dismisses a criminal application filed in the context of a matrimonial dispute where robbery allegations were involved, finding the applicant's theory improbable and no case made out by the applicant.
Criminal Application No.112/2014 rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
appln112.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.112/2014
(Abdul Karim Samroddin ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, thr.PSO P.S.Ramdaspeth, Akola & ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,__________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr. A. I. Sheikh, Advocate for applicant. Mrs. Joshi, A.P.P. for non applicant-State. Mr. Thakkar, Advocate for non applicant nos. 2 to 4.
CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATE : JUNE 24, 2015.
Heard.
The applicant and non applicants are closely related. The matter relates to the matrimonial dispute. The allegations of offence of robbery have been made against the non applicants.
The theory put forth by the applicant is highly improbable. Be that as it may, no case is made out by the applicant. Hence, I pass the following order.
ORDER
(i) Criminal Application Nos.112/2014 is
rejected.
JUDGE
kahale
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal application relating to matrimonial dispute alleging robbery should be rejected?
What is the court's decision on the application?
Abdul Karim Samroddin
State of Maharashtra
PSO P.S.Ramdaspeth, Akola
ors.
A.B. CHAUDHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
