Partly allowed

Amol Arun Ukarande v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC22 Jan 2015APPA/80/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This short order deals with an application for temporary bail to attend a brother's wedding. The High Court, noting the appellant's delay in filing the appeal and lack of parole efforts, declined to grant full bail. Instead, it directed prison authorities to escort the applicant on police discretion for the specific event, with expenses borne by the applicant.

What did the court decide?

Application partly allowed; jail authorities directed to provide police escort for applicant to attend brother's wedding on 25/01/2015, provided applicant deposits charges with Central Prison.

Amol Arun Ukarande Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2015)

appa-80-15

pdp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2015 IN

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL STAMP NO. 72 OF 2015

¶6

Amol Arun Ukarande .. Applicant Vs.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

¶8

Mr. Sharad T. Bhosale i/by Mr. Jaydeep Mane for applicant. Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for State.

¶9

CORAM: P. V. HARDAS &

¶10

DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI,JJ.

¶11

JANUARY 22, 2015.

¶12

P.C.

¶13

This application has been filed by the applicant seeking his release on temporary bail in order to enable the applicant to attend the wedding of his brother which is scheduled to be solemnized on 25/01/2015 at Mudguleshwar Mandir, Sindphal, Taluka – Tulzapur, District – Osmanabad.

¶14

This application has been filed accompanying the application for condonation of delay and the substantive appeal challenging his conviction. The application seeking condonation of delay of one year and 361 days has been filed practically after two years. The appeal was filed on 14/1/2015 and was circulated before us for today. The appeal is

¶15

¶16

appa-80-15

¶17

accompanied by this application which seeks release on conditional bail in order to attend the marriage. No efforts has been made by the applicant to file an appeal and application early or to seek the parole for attending the marriage of his brother. Since the appeal, along with the applications, has been filed and circulated before us and the prosecution cannot be given any opportunity, as any adjournment would render the present application infructuous and also taking into consideration the merits of the mater, we are not inclined to suspend the substantive sentence of imprisonment and release the applicant on bail on the grounds stated in this application.

¶18

However, in order to ensure that the applicant is allowed to attend the wedding of his brother, we partly allow this application to the extent of directing the jail authorities to take the applicant in police escort from Yerwada Central Prison, Pune to the place of wedding in order to ensure that the applicant is present on 25/1/2015 at 12.00 noon in order to attend the wedding. The learned counsel for the applicant states on instructions that the applicant shall bear the charges of the police escort as well as the transportation. The aforesaid charges to be deposited by the applicant on or before 23/1/2015 with the jail authorities at Yerawada Central Prison, Pune. On such charges being deposited, the prison authorities shall arrange for a necessary escort for taking the applicant to the place of wedding, if necessary, by starting from Yerawada Central Prison on 24/1/2015 and lodging the applicant in the jail at Osmanabad on the night of 24/1/2015. The jail authorities shall ensure that the applicant is brought to the Yerawada Central Prison, Pune, on 25/1/2015 in the evening. The jail authorities shall intimate the relatives of the applicant immediately

¶19

¶20

appa-80-15

¶21

the charges of the police escort so as to enable the relatives of the applicant to deposit the said charges.

¶22

Application is allowed to the extent indicated above.

¶23

Copy of this order duly authenticated be provided to the learned counsel for the parties to act upon.

¶24

Learned APP undertakes to communicate this order to the Superintendent, Yerawada Central Prison, Pune forthwith.

¶25

(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI,J.) (P. V. HARDAS,J.)

Amol Arun Ukarande v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amol Arun Ukarande v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramjan Abdul Hamid Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Jiten Bhanu Sing and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Santosh Ashok Chavan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Laxman Baburamji Parihar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Amol Arun Ukarande Vs the State of Maharashtra

Akhtar Hussein Siddiqui Vs the State of Maharashtra