The court condoned a delay of over one year in filing a criminal appeal by the applicant against his conviction after hearing foreign counsel arguments.
Condonation of delay of one year and 361 days in filing Criminal Appeal; application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pdp
appa-79-15
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 79 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL STAMP NO. 72 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. Sharad T. Bhosale i/by Mr. Jaydeep Mane for applicant.
Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for State.
CORAM : P. V. HARDAS AND
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 22, 2015.
P.C.:
By this application, the applicant/accused seeks condonation of delay of one year and 361 days in filing Criminal Appeal challenging his conviction.
We have heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP and for the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed and delay is condoned.
(DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.)
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a one-year and 361-day delay in filing a criminal appeal is condonable.
P.C.
State
P. V. Hardas
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
