High Court of Bombay Criminal Appellate Side allowed an application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against conviction. The delay of one year and 120 days was condoned for the reasons stated in the application.
Delay of one year and 120 days in filing an appeal challenging conviction is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pdp
appa-393-15
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 393 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL STAMP NO. 363 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mrs. Rupali Shinde, Appointed Advocate for applicant. Mrs. Sangeeta D. Shinde, APP for State.
CORAM : P. V. HARDAS AND DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 29, 2015.
P.C.:
By this application, the applicant prays for condonation of delay of one year and 120 days in filing an appeal challenging his conviction.
We have heard learned counsel appointed for the applicant and the learned APP and for the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed and delay is condoned.
(DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.)
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of one year and 120 days in filing an appeal challenging conviction should be condoned.
Applicant
State
P. V. Hardas
Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
