This single-paragraph order allows Criminal Application No. 275 of 2015 filed by an accused to condone a delay of 1 year and 230 days in filing an appeal challenging his conviction, finding reasons stated in the application sufficient.
Condonation of delay of 1 year and 230 days in filing an appeal challenging conviction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPA 275.15.sxw
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 275 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL ST. NO. 277 OF 2015
Walmik Devram Lahange.
... Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra.
... Respondent.
Mr. K.M. Sangani for the Applicant. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the State.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS &
Dr. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
MARCH 10, 2015.
P.C. :-
By this application the Applicant/Accused seeks condonation of delay of 1 year and 230 days in filing an Appeal challenging his conviction.
We have heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and the learned APP and for the reasons stated in the Application, Application is allowed and delay is condoned.
(DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 1 year and 230 days in filing an appeal can be condoned under the relevant procedural provisions.
Walmik Devram Lahange
The State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
