The High Court of Bombay dismissed the applicant's criminal application for release on temporary bail or parole. The court noted that since the applicant could avail parole and there were eye witnesses, it declined to suspend the sentence or grant bail.
Temporary bail or parole application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5 APPA 192 OF 2015.doc
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.192 OF 2015 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.447 OF 2013
Sumanbhai Vilas Himanshu … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
Mr. Abhaykumar Apte, for Appellant.
Mr. H. J. Dedhia, A.P.P., for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 9TH MARCH, 2015.
P.C. :
the applicant was not on bail and there are eye witnesses to the incident,
Page No.1 of 2
5 APPA 192 OF 2015.doc
we are not inclined to suspend the substantive sentence of imprisonment
and release the applicant on bail.
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.]
Page No.2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to release on temporary bail or parole to attend to his father's ailment.
Sumanbhai Vilas Himanshu
The State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
