The High Court of Bombay (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) considered a bail application during the pendency of an appeal against conviction for rape and abduction. The court denied bail, citing the gravity of the offence and the sentence awarded.
Application for bail rejected; matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
5.APPA.1685-14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1685 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.431 OF 2014
Mr. Ravindra Narayan Navale Versus
The State of Maharashtra
..Applicant
..Respondent
Mr. Vinod Kashid and Abdul Shaikh, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. Anamika Mahotra, APP, for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : A. R. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 8th JUNE, 2015
P.C.
1 / 2
2
5.APPA.1685-14.doc
( A. R. JOSHI, J.)
Deshmane (PS)
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail during the pendency of the criminal appeal for offences under Sections 363 and 376 of IPC.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Ravindra Narayan Navale
The State of Maharashtra
A. R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
