Appellant State challenged respondent's acquittal for IPC 354. Court held appeal is incompetent; it must be filed before Sessions Court under CrPC 378(1)(a). Dismissed without engaging merits.
Appeal dismissed; the Appellant State directed to take appropriate steps to file appeal before Sessions Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
37.apeal.135-14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.135 OF 2014
The State of Maharashtra Versus
Sunil Hiralal Supat
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mrs. Anamika Malhotra, APP, for the Appellant – State.
CORAM : A. R. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 8th JUNE, 2015
P.C.
Deshmane (PS)
1 / 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal appeal against acquittal lies directly to the High Court before the appeal is taken before the Sessions Court.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Sunil Hiralal Supat
A. R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
