The Bombay High Court examined a bail application where previous grounds were exhausted. Rejecting the bail prayer due to lack of fresh grounds, the Court expedited the hearing of the underlying criminal appeal.
Bail prayer rejected; hearing of Criminal Appeal No.132 of 2013 expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14 APPA 1513 OF 2015.doc
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1513 OF 2015
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.132 OF 2013
Udal H Nanak
… Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
Ms. Sarojini Upadhyay, appointed advocate for the Applicant. Mr. H. J. Dedia, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI ACTING CJ & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.
DATE : 15th DECEMBER, 2015.
P.C. :
However, the hearing of the appeal is expedited.
1
14 APPA 1513 OF 2015.doc
in Yerwada Central Prison, Pune.
[ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE.]
2
14 APPA 1513 OF 2015.doc
C E R T I F I C A T E
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed order.
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant fresh bail to the applicant in the absence of any new grounds?
Udal H Nanak
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
