Disposed
Mohd. Yasin Chhutan Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/820/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
null
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 8.cri.wp.820.14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 820 OF 2014
Mohd. Yasin Chuttan Shaikh C-8004, lodged in Nashik Road Central Prison
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Ms. Sonia Miskin Advocate appointed for Petitioner Mr. A.S.Shitole A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI ACTING C.J. & DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 14, 2015
P.C.:
1 Learned A.P.P. seeks leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
2 Heard both sides. Rule. By consent, Rule made returnable forthwith.
3 The petitioner has preferred an application for furlough on 4.3.2013. The D.I.G. (Prisons), Central Region, Pune received an adverse police report, hence, the application for furlough came to be rejected on 2.8.2013. Being aggrieved
1 of 2
jdk 2 8.cri.wp.820.14.doc
thereby, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Inspector General of Prisons, Pune on 2.9.2013. The said appeal came to be remanded back to the D.I.G. Prisons, Central Region, Aurangabad stating that if the petitioner is ready to give able surety then the competent authority may take a decision about the furlough leave of the petitioner, however, the petitioner in his reply dated 9.12.2013 has stated that he is unable to furnish another surety, hence, the application and furlough application came to be rejected on 26.12.2013. However, it is seen that thereafter the petitioner filed another application for furlough on 8.12.2014. The said application came to be allowed and the petitioner was released on furlough on 17.4.2015 and he was to surrender back on 9.5.2015. Pursuant to the said order, the petitioner enjoyed his furlough leave and reported back on 9.5.2015. Looking to the fact that thereafter the petitioner was released on furlough, this petition has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged.
[ DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [ ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ]
kandarkar
2 of 2
Mohd. Yasin Chuttan Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court