Criminal Application regarding travel abroad petition. Court held as Supreme Court stay was vacated, applicant must move Magistrate afresh. Application disposed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
spb/
7apl96-15.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 96 OF 2015
Sneha Sandesh Ghosalkar … Applicant.
V/s.
Vikas Khanolkar & Anr. … Respondents.
Ms. Shweta Sangtani, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. A.A. Mane, APP for the State- Respondent No.2.
CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI,J. DATE : 04th MARCH, 2015
P.C. :
1 Heard learned Advocate Ms. Shweta Sangtani for the Applicant and the learned additional public prosecutor Mrs. Mane for the State.
2 Perused the impugned order. The learned Magistrate has refused to consider the application for travelling abroad on merits as there was stay of the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the proceedings pending before the learned Magistrate. The learned counsel submits that the stay has now been vacated. In view thereof, in my opinion, the applicant shall move the learned Magistrate afresh.
1/2
Borey
spb/ 7apl96-15.sxw
3 The learned Magistrate shall decide the application on merits, if such an application is made by the applicant. The learned Magistrate is expected to decide the application within a period of two weeks from the date of making the application.
5 Parties and trial Magistrate to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
2/2
Borey
Sneha Sandesh Ghosalkar
Vikas Khanolkar
State
M.L. Tahaliyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
