Disposed
Satish N. Dharap v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/1076/2001
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
220_wp_1076_2001.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1076 OF 2001 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1077 OF 2001
Satish N. Dharap
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
…. Respondents
Mr. Satish N. Dharap, Petitioner in-person present. Mr. U.P. Warunjikar, for Respondent No.2 Smt. A.A. Mane, APP, for the Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM:-M.L. TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : -3/3/2015
P.C.
Heard Petitioner in-person Mr. Satish Dharap and learned Advocate Mr. Uday Warunjikar for Respondent No.2.
granted.
(JUDGE)
megha Page No.1 of 1
Satish N. Dharap
The State of Maharashtra
M.L. TAHALIYANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court