Appeal from Order No. 696 of 2014 and Civil Application No. 1353 of 2014 were taken on board after a request. The appellant moved to withdraw the matter due to settlement; the withdrawal was allowed and the proceedings dismissed.
Withdrawal of appeal and civil application allowed; proceedings dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PR 3 ao 696-14=.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 696 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1353 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Ms. Harsha Vaidya i/b Vishwakarma & Asso. for the appellant/applicant.
Mr. Rohit Sakhdeo for the respondent nos. 5 to 7 CIDCO.
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATED : 02/02/2015.
P.C.:
. Not on board. At the request of Advocate for the appellant, matter is taken on board for urgent orders.
2 Advocate for the appellant filed praicepe dated 02.02.2015 stating that matter is settled out of court. Hence, they may be allowed to withdraw the same. Same is allowed.
3 Appeal from Order as well as Civil Application stand dismissed as withdrawn.
1/1
Sneha Chavan
K. K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
