Partly allowed

Shri Shabbirahmad Dadebapu Pirjade and Anr. v. Smt. Manuma @ Badima Kamaluddin Pirjade and Anr.

Bombay HC2 Feb 2015AO/396/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge set aside part of the District Judge's order, remanding two additional issues to the Trial Court under Order 41 Rule 25 CPC for the parties to adduce evidence within six months. The appeal was partly allowed.

What did the court decide?

The order dated 22.01.2014 is partly set aside; two issues referred to Trial Court; parties to lead evidence within six months.

Shri Shabbirahmad Dadebapu Pirjade and Anr. Vs Smt… — Execution and Attachment | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

41 ao 396-14=.doc

¶2

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.

¶3

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 396 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 450 OF 2014

¶4

Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶5

Mr.T.S. Ingle for the appellant/applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar for the respondent nos. 1 and 2.

¶6

CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATED : 02/02/2015.

¶7

P.C.:

¶8

. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶9

2 By this Appeal from Order the appellant plaintiff challenges the judgment and decree dated 22.01.2014 passed by learned District Judge -2 Islampur in Regular Civil Appeal no. 34 of 2008 setting aside the judgment and decree dated 28.01.2008 passed by the 4^th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Islampur in Regular Civil Suit no. 343 of 2000 and remanding the matter to the Trial Court by framing additional two issues.

¶10

3 The learned counsel Mr. Palkar appearing on behalf of respondents makes a statement that they have no objections if as per Order 41 Rule 25 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 if those two issues

1/2

Sneha Chavan

41 ao 396-14=.doc

are referred to the Trial Court for their findings after allowing all the parties to lead evidence according to law.

¶15

4 Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant and no objections given by the learned counsel for the respondent, the following order is passed:

¶16

a) The order dated 22.01.2014 passed by learned District Judge -2 Islampur in Regular Civil Appeal no. 34 of 2008 is partly set aside.

¶17

b) Two issues framed by the Appellate Court in paragraph 9 of the impugned order is referred to the Trial Court for its decision as per Order 41 Rule 25 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by allowing both the parties to lead additional evidence, if they so desire.

¶18

c) Trial Court is directed to decide these two issues as early as possible, in any case, within six months from the receipt of writ from this court.

¶19

d) With these directions, Appeal from Order is partly allowed.

¶20

e) In view of disposal of Appeal from Order, nothing survives in the Civil Application. Hence, same is also disposed of.

¶21

2/2

¶22

Sneha Chavan

Shri Shabbirahmad Dadebapu Pirjade and Anr. v. Smt. Manuma @ Badima Kamaluddin Pirjade and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Shabbirahmad Dadebapu Pirjade and Anr. v. Smt. Manuma @ Badima Kamaluddin Pirjade and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Maharashtra (Thro. ) the Sub-Divisional Officer, Ulhasnagar Township and Ors. Vs Surendra M. Uppal and Ors.

Shri. Nandkumar Sadashiv Gulvani and Ors. Vs Shri. Yogesh Sahadeo Mane and Anr.

Mr. Mohammad Alim Yar Mohammad Vs the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai

Robert Paul Raj Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

M/S. Giridhar Creations and Ors. Vs Shri Baban Baburao Pathare and Ors.

M/S. Proviso Builders and Developers Vs Shri Pilaji Mahadev Naik and Ors.