This criminal application admitted appeal filed by the State. The High Court held that a prima facie arguable case existed based on the judgment and eye witness depositions. The court directed action under Section 390 CrPC.
Leave to appeal granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-als-63.2015
Hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 63 OF 2015
The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant V/s. Ajay @ Taydya Bhimrao Ubale and Ors. .. Respondents
Mrs. M.M.Deshmukh, A.P.P. For the State.
Mr. Harshad Palwe for the respondent nos. 3 and 4.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND V.L.ACHLIYA, JJ. DATED : 4th DECEMBER, 2015
P.C. :-
Heard the learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 4. Perused the impugned judgment as well as the deposition of the eye witnesses. Prima facie, in our view, arguable case is made out. We, therefore, grant leave to file appeal.
Procedure Code be taken.
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a prima facie arguable case is made out on the facts.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Ajay @ Taydya Bhimrao Ubale and Ors.
Ranjit More
V.L. Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
