In a writ petition for directing police to register an offence based on a complaint, the Court found the matter involved a civil dispute. Consequently, it held the case was not fit for Writ jurisdiction.
Writ petition dismissed with direction to file a private complaint before the concerned Magistrate if aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No.15
WP 1761.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1761 OF 2015
Shri Dnyanoba Sakharam Dhayarkar Versus State of Maharashtra through Shri Sanjeev Dayal, The Director General of Police and ors.
..Petitioner
..Respondents
Mr. D. S. Dhayarkar, petitioner-in-person. Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ.
DATE : 3rd DECEMBER, 2015.
P. C. :
The petition is filed for direction to respondents to register an offence on the basis of the petitioner's complaint, a copy of which is annexed at page 36 of the petition.
Shubhada S Kadam 1/2
Sr.No.15
WP 1761.15
2/2
Shubhada S Kadam
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court can exercise its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution to direct registration of an offence in a case involving a civil dispute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Dnyanoba Sakharam Dhayarkar
State of Maharashtra
RANJIT MORE
V. L. ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
