Nagesh Sudam Gurav v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment confirms interim pre-arrest bail for an accused facing rape charges. The court found the FIR indicated consensual intercourse and ordered bail continuation subject to renewed attendance.
What did the court decide?
Pre-arrest bail ordered on same terms and conditions with requirement of attendance till charge-sheet filing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5-aba-867-2015.doc
Vishal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.867 OF 2015
Nagesh Gurav ... Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr. Shailesh Kharat, for the Applicant. Mr. S.S. Pednekar, APP for Respondent – State.
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE: JULY 22, 2015
P.C.:
. The application is moved for pre arrest bail as the applicant/accused is facing charges for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 323, 504 and 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code in C.R. No. 156 of 2015 registered with Khed police station, Pune.
- The offence is registered at the instance of prosecutrix on
21st May, 2015. As per the case of the prosecution, the incidents of
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be granted continuation of interim pre-arrest bail despite failure to comply with previous conditions.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Nagesh Gurav
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
MRIDULA BHATKAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court