This bail application was disposed of because the case was part-heard. The Court directed the session judge to complete the trial within three months.
Direction to complete the trial within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6.BA576_2015.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 576 OF 2015
Muthu Kumaran Arumugam ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharastra ... Respondent
Smt. Smita R. Gaidhani, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for the respondent/State.
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : JULY 21, 2015
P.C.:
This Application is moved for bail, as the applicant/accused is facing
charges for the offences punishable under sections 397 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code in C.R. No. I-89 of 2014 registered with Indira Nagar Police Station, District Nashik.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
1 / 1
Muthu Kumaran Arumugam
The State of Maharastra
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
