In Criminal Writ Petition No. 39 of 2014, the Goa High Court held that the petition concerning parole application lacks merit following the rejection thereof. The court declared that nothing survives in the petition as the petitioners were not in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 39 OF 2014
MISS. KOMAL SINGH AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY ... Respondent
Mr. Ryan Da Piedade Menezes, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. D. Lawande, Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.
Coram:F. M. REIS & Z. A. HAQ, JJ. Date:24th April, 2014
P.C.
During the course of the hearing of the above petition, Mr. Lawande, learned Additional Public Prosecutor produced a communication dated 21.04.2014 rejecting the application for extension of parole.
Z. A. HAQ, J. F. M. REIS, J.
at*
Miss. Komal Singh and Anr.
The State of Goa through Chief Secretary
F. M. REIS
Z. A. HAQ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
