Petition challenging the stay of a walk-in-interview advertisement impugned order by the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding regularization of railway contract employees.
Petition rejected without expressing opinion on merits of the original application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp9113.14.sxw
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 9113 OF 2014
Union of India through General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai CST & anr. ... Petitioners V/s. Rajesh A. Bharte & ors. ... Respondents
Mr. T.J. Pandian for the petitioners. Mr. S.V. Marne for the respondents.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ .
7th October , 2014.
P.C.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2/2 wp9113.14.sxw
of by the judgment and order dated 24th June, 2014. The learned Counsel submits that Railways have filed a review petition in the said proceedings which is pending consideration before the Tribunal. The petitioners thereafter issued a fresh advertisement dated 3rd August, 2014. In Original Application No. 491/2014 filed by respondent, the present impugned order was passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Bombay Bench, Mumbai on 14th August, 2014.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.)
(NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the stay of advertisement for walk-in-interview by the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Union of India through General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai CST
Rajesh A. Bharte
NARESH H. PATIL
B.P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
