Petitioners withdrew Writ Petition No. 906 of 2011 as the matter was settled between parties, leading to disposal and vacation of the interim order dated 28 September 2011.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn; interim order dated 28 September 2011 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
912-wp906.11.sxw
ssm 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 906 OF 2011
Bajirao Kashiram Gaikwad & Ors. Vs.
….Petitioners.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents.
Ms. Anchal Singhania for Sandeep V. Marne for the Petitioners. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND A.S.GADKARI, JJ. DATE : 21 AUGUST 2014.
P.C.:-
The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners, on instructions, withdrawing the present Writ Petition, which is already admitted, as the matter is settled between the parties. The present
Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of, as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order dated 28 September 2011 also
stands vacated.
2 Rule is discharged accordingly .
(A.S.GADKARI, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
1/1
Bajirao Kashiram Gaikwad & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Anoop V. Mohta
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
