The High Court of Bombay allowed a civil application to amend a writ petition to bring subsequent evidence on record for adjudication of claims.
Civil application allowed for amendment of writ petition; Petitioners to amend within one week; Respondents to file additional affidavit within two weeks thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
211-caw2808.13.sxw
ssm 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2808 OF 2013 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2471 OF 1999
Shri Shankar Yashvant Nalawade & Ors. Vs.
Collector of Satara & Ors.
….Applicants.
….Respondents.
Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. H.S. Venegavkar for the Applicants.
Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND
A.S.GADKARI, JJ. DATE : 21 AUGUST 2014.
P.C.:-
The present Civil Application is taken out by the ApplicantsOriginal Petitioners, to amend the Writ Petition for bringing on record the subsequent evidence which are relevant for adjudication of the claims/prayers so made in the Petition.
2 By keeping all points open, including the defence if any, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). The Petitioners to carry out the amendment within one week from today. The Respondents to file additional affidavit, if any, two weeks thereafter.
3 Writ Petition be placed on board in week commencing from 22 September 2014.
(A.S.GADKARI, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
1/1
Shri Shankar Yashvant Nalawade
Collector of Satara
Anoop V. Mota
A. S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
