A typographical error in a previous order's writ petition number is corrected, along with a note to the original order and server records. The complete substantive reasons or outcome of the case are absent from the provided text, preventing extraction of legal propositions or parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp883
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.883 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Raju Yamgar for the Petitioner
Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.A.SAYED,JJ.
DATE : APRIL 17, 2014.
P.C.
.Not on board. Taken on board.
1There is a typographical error
while mentioning the Writ petition
number against the column (B) on page 7
of the Judgment dated 20th March 2014.
The Writ Petition number shall be
corrected as 883 of 2012 instead of 833
of 2012. Correction shall be carried
out to the original order as well as
order uploaded on server.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court