The High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution, citing that the address of the sole petitioner appearing in person was incomplete and returned unserved.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to incomplete address.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp842
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.842 OF 1989
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
None for the Petitioner
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.S.CHANDURKAR,JJ.
DATE : JULY 1,2014.
P.C.
1The petitioner is appearing in
person. The office remarks show that
earlier when a letter was sent to the
petitioner informing him the date fixed
in the matter, the said letter has been
returned unserved by the Postal
Department with remark that the address
of the petitioner is incomplete. It is
the duty of the petitioner to furnish
the correct address especially when he
is appearing in person. Hence, we
dismissthispetitionfornon
prosecution.
Petitioner
Respondent
A.S. Oka
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court