Appana Shivgonda Patil v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed for non-appearance of the applicant.
ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
Application dismissed for non-appearance of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw304
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.304 OF 2010 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.448 OF 1995
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
None for the Applicant
Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for the Respondent No.1.
Mr.M.S.Karnik for respondent No.2
Mr.C.M.Lokesh i/b M/s.G.S.Hegde & Associates for
respondent No.4
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.S.CHANDURKAR,JJ.
DATE : JULY 1,2014.
P.C.
1None appears for the applicant. The
learned counsel for the second
respondent is present. As none appears
for the applicant, we dismiss the
application for non prosecution.
(A.S.CHANDURKAR,J)(A.S.OKA,J.)
Unknown Applicant
Respondent No. 1
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 4
A.S. OKA
A.S. CHANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court