Two civil writ petitions filed by a petitioner seeking relief regarding pay scale protection were disposed of as infructuous after the respondent Corporation confirmed the pay scale was protected in the transferred post.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP8403.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 8403 OF 2012
WITH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5478 OF 2012
Abhimanyu Pandurang Jadhav .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Mr. Siddharth Gadve i/b Vijay Killedar, Advocate for the petitioner. Dr. Jayashree B. Kurup 'B' Panel, AGP for R. No. 1 – State. Mr. Umesh Mankapure, Advocate for R. No. 2 – Corporation.
CORAM:-NARESH H. PATIL & R. V. GHUGE, JJ. DATED : -10/06/2014
P.C.
The learned counsel for the respondent-
Corporation on instructions makes statement that the pay scale
of the petitioner has been protected in the transferred post, hence the petitions have become infructuous. The counsel
for the petitioner submits that appropriate order in the light of
1/2
2
WP8403.12
the statement made by the counsel for the respondentCorporation be passed.
2 In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent-Corporation, both the petitions are disposed of.
(R. V. GHUGE, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
md.saleem
2/2
Abhimanyu Pandurang Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
Corporation
NARESH H. PATIL
R. V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
