Petitioner, an Ex-Serviceman with M.A. qualification, filed a writ petition seeking appointment as Gramsevak contrary to advertisement requirements. The court held facts did not warrant extraordinary writ jurisdiction and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed; no appointment directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
12041.13wp.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 12041 OF 2013
Shri Dhanraj Parappa Munjal. ... Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents.
Rahul S. Kadam for the petitioner.
A.I.Patel, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Sudhir Prabhu for respondent No.3.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND R.V.GHUGE, JJ. DATED : 9th June 2014.
P.C.
Heard.
2/2 12041.13wp.sxw
(R.V.GHUGE, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
Sanjay Nanoskar, P.S..
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a petitioner with M.A. qualification and Ex-Servicemen status is entitled to be considered for the post of Gramsevak requiring only 10th standard pass with diploma in Agriculture Science.
Whether the High Court should exercise its extraordinary writ jurisdiction to direct appointment or reconsideration.
Shri Dhanraj Parappa Munjal
The State of Maharashtra
others
NRESH H. PATIL
R.V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
