Vijay Shridhar Panicker v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
6.writ petition 8133.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8133 OF 2014
Vijay Shridhar Panicker ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors ..Respondents
Mr. Harinder Toor a/w Mr. S. B. Pawar, Ms. Swati Pawar i/b S. K.Legal Associates,for the Petitioner.
Mr. C. P. Yadav, AGP,for Respondent Nos. 1 and 4.
Ms.Shyamali Gadre a/w Mr. Abhijit D. I/b Little and Co, for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM :- NARESH H. PATIL & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE :- SEPTEMBER 29, 2014.
P. C.:
At the fag end of the hearing of the Petition it was pointed out that Respondent Nos.2 and 3 had filed affidavit in reply but copy of the same was not annexed to the Petition. The copy was called from the registry. It is informed that the affidavit in reply was filed on 22nd September 2014. We have witnessed such instances in various matters which causes inconvenience to the Court, lawyers and litigants. Registrar (Judl.) to look into such lapses and take remedial measures so that such instances do not occur repeatedly.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction to the Registrar to address lapses regarding annexure of reply affidavits is appropriate.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vijay Shridhar Panicker
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
NARESH H. PATIL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court