The court observed that the cause of action arose in Mumbai, necessitating filing on the Original Side. Consequently, the judgment transfers the writ petition to the Original Side, directing the petitioner to make consequential amendments within three weeks.
Transfer of the writ petition to the Original Side of the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
42 wp8021-14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8021 OF 2014
Shri Ramjas Ramraj Upadhyay .. Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Amarendra Mishra for the petitioner
Mr.S.N.Patil, A.G.P. for respondent no.1
CORAM : A.S.OKA & A.S.GADKARI, JJ. DATED : 20/12/2014
PC :
1 The entire cause of action for filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has arisen in Mumbai. Therefore, this petition ought to have been filed on the Original Side. 2 Accordingly, we transfer the petition to the Original Side. Consequential amendments shall be carried out by the petitioner within a period of three weeks from today.
(A.S.GADKARI, J) ( A.S. OKA, J )
1/1
Mohite
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a cause of action arising in Mumbai ought to be disposed of by the Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Bench or transferred t
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Ramjas Ramraj Upadhyay
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
