In Writ Petition No. 7438 of 2014, the Bench at Aurangabad held that no case was made out for exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition was rejected as being devoid of substance.
Petition stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp7438.14.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7438 OF 2014
Kishor s/o Gangadhar Deobone .. PETITIONER
VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. S. S. Thombre, advocate for petitioner.
Mr. V. H. Dighe, AGP for the State.
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER, 2014.
PER COURT :
( V. K. JADHAV ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition merits interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kishor s/o Gangadhar Deobone
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
