A writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as no advocate appeared for the petitioner and the petitioner was discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp7230
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7230 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.P.G.Sarda, Advocate for the Petitionerdischarged
None for the petitioner
Ms M.P.Thakur, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4
Mr.Mayuresh Modgi for respondent No.5
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.A.SAYED,JJ.
DATE : MARCH 7, 2014.
P.C.
1The learned Advocate for the
petitioner states that under the orders
of the Registrar he has been
discharged.
2None appears for the petitioner. We
accordingly dismiss the petition for
non prosecution.
(A.A.SAYED,J)(A.S.OKA,J.)
Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 to 4
Respondent No. 5
A.S.Oka
A.A.Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court