Allowed

Ajinkyatara Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, through Legal Officer, Shri. Arvind Mahadeo Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Principal Secretary, Co.Operation and Textile Department

Bombay HC7 Mar 2014CAW/603/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay, in a civil application, found that a case for restoration is made out based on averments in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the application. The application was allowed.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; petition restored and listed on CMIS date.

What the court decided

Ajinkyatara Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, through… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

caw603

¶2

¶3

ssp

¶4

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.603 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4425 OF 2012

¶7

Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders

¶8

Mr.Ashish Pawar i/b Mr.Manoj A.Patil for the Applicant
Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2

¶9

CORAM : A.S.OKA, &

¶10

A.A.SAYED,JJ.
 DATE : MARCH 7, 2014.

¶11

P.C.

¶12

1Heard the learned counsel for the
applicant. In view of the averments
made in the application and in
particular paragraphs 4 and 5 thereof,
a case for restoration is made out.
Application is allowed in terms of
prayer clause (a). Restored petition
shall be listed on the date fixed as
per the CMIS.

Ajinkyatara Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, through Legal Officer, Shri. Arvind Mahadeo Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Principal Secretary, Co.Operation and Textile Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Ajinkyatara Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, through Legal Officer, Shri. Arvind Mahadeo Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Principal Secretary, Co.Operation and Textile Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Maruti Bala Mane Vs the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept and Ors.

Pundalik Bahirji Ingale Vs Col. R. D. Nikam Sainik Sahakari Bank Ltd. and Ors.

Pundalik Bahirji Ingale Vs the Kalyan Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd, Satara Branch and Ors.

Vijay Laxman Kadam Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bhagini Nivedita Mahila Sahakari Path Sanstha and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Deputy Superintendent of Police Home and Ors.

Sharanbasappa Pundalik Birajdar Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept and Ors.