The High Court disposed of the writ petition upon withdrawal by the petitioner, keeping merit contentions open pending government approval of the proposal.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn; merits kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-6814.13
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6814 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Nagesh Y. Chavan for the Petitioner. Shri V.S. Gokhale, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ DATED : 25TH MARCH 2014
P.C.:
. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner
states that as of today, the State Government has not granted approval to the proposal submitted by the Tasgaon Municipal Council under Section 37(1) of the Maharashtra and Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 on the basis of the impugned resolution dated 6th February 2009. He states that the Petitioner has already raised an objection to the said proposal.
2
wp-6814.13
ash
proposal submitted by the Municipal Corporation is sanctioned by the State Government.
withdrawn. All the contentions raised by the Petitioner on merits are kept open.
Petitioner
State Government
Tasgaon Municipal Council
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court