Held that proceedings were premature as elections were over, though results undetermined. Court refused to continue petition and disposed of it with liberty. Interim order vacated.
Instant petition stands disposed of with liberty to take appropriate proceedings. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-:(1):-
6738
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders. of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
WRIT PETITION NO. 6738 OF 2013 WITH CA/11695/2013 IN WP/6738/2013
MOHAMMAD FARUK SARFODDIN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Gaddime Arvind N. AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. K. G. Patil.
Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : Mr. R. D. Kawade, Advocate h/f Mr. P., R. Katneshwarkar.
CORAM: R. M. BORDE AND A. M. BADAR, JJ. DATED: 3rd MAY, 2014.
PER COURT:
[A.M.BADAR,J.] [R.M.BORDE, J.]
Dt.03/05/2014 ans/6738
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to exercise jurisdiction to direct declaration of election results when elections were already over at the time of hearing.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammad Faruk Sarfoddin
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
