The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn after granting the petitioner's leave to withdraw the same.
Leave to withdraw granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
WP 214/12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.214/2012
M/s Twaritapuri Sugars Ltd.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri A.A. Nimbalkar, Advocate h/f Shri V.D. Salunke,
Advocate for petitioner.
Shri K.G. Patil, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2.
Shri Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General for
respondent nos.3 to 5.
Shri S.S. Choudhary, Advocate for respondent no.6.
.....
CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE: 02.05.2014
ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave is granted.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(A.M. BADAR, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.)
ndk/c2514
M/s Twaritapuri Sugars Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
others
R.M. BORDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court