Allowed

Krushi Jivan Vikas Prathistan, through Chairman, Mr. Babasaheb Sonbaji Wasade and Anr. v. Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Bombay HC14 Jul 2014WP/6596/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the High Court of Bombay allowed the plea identifying issues identical to a previously allowed writ petition regarding admission capacity for a Mining Engineering course and directed the Directorate of Technical Education to issue a notification and publish admission details.

What did the court decide?

Direction to issue Government Resolution/Notification for admission of 60 to 120 students in Mining Engineering course for A.Y. 2014-15 and to publish details on the website for common admission proce

Krushi Jivan Vikas Prathistan, through Chairman, Mr… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

dgm 1

¶2

wp-6596-14- 14-4.sxw

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 6596 OF 2014

¶6

Krushi Jivan Vikas Prathistan & anr. .... Petitioners

¶7

¶8

Directorate of Technical Education and ors.

¶9

.... Respondents

¶10

Mr. S.C. Naidu i/by Vipin Kamdi for the Petitioners. Mr. Saniputta Samath i/by Mr. Mihir Desai for AICTE. Ms.S.S. Bhende, AGP for Respondent/State.

¶11

CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : July 14, 2014

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of

¶14

parties.

¶15

2 Both the Counsel make a statement that the issues

¶16

involved in this Petition are identical to the issues involved in Writ Petition no.5816 of 2014 (Dr. D.Y. Patil Pratishthan's Padmashree

¶17

Dr. D.Y. Patil Polytechnic V/s. Directorate of Technical Education,

¶18

Maharashtra State & Ors) , which Writ Petition has been allowed

¶19

byjudgment and order dated 9th July, 2014.

1/2

dgm 2

wp-6596-14- 14-4.sxw

3 Therefore, for the reasons stated in the aforesaid order

¶24

dated 9^th July, 2014, the present Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses a(i) and (ii) as under:

¶25

(i) the Respondent Nos.2 in it's Higher & Technical Education Department to forthwith issue appropriate Government Resolution/Notification notifying that the Petitioner College for admission to First Year Diploma level Course Mining Engineering with intake capacity of 60 to 120 students for A.Y. 2014-15;

¶26

(ii) the Respondent No.1 to forthwith publish on its website for common Admission Procedure inter-alia that admission to the Petitioner college for First Year Diploma level, Course Mining Engineering with intake capacity of 60 to 120 students for A.Y. 2014-15 for CAP round-I and subsequent CAP round conducted by DTE Mumbai.

¶27

4 Rule made absolute accordingly. No costs.

¶28

5 It is made clear that the Petitioner Institution shall comply

¶29

with other obligations/formalities, if any.

¶30

( A. A. SAYED, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)

¶31

2/2

Krushi Jivan Vikas Prathistan, through Chairman, Mr. Babasaheb Sonbaji Wasade and Anr. v. Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krushi Jivan Vikas Prathistan, through Chairman, Mr. Babasaheb Sonbaji Wasade and Anr. v. Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shikshan and Krushi Vikas Pratishthan, Medshingi, through President, Dilipkumar Ingawale Vs All India Council for Technical Education and Ors.

Shikshan and Krushi Vikas Pratishthan, Medshingi, through President, Dilipkumar Ingawale Vs All India Council for Technical Education and Ors.

K. B. H. S. S. Trust, through Mr. Bairagi Vinod Ashokdas Vs All India Council for Technical Education and Ors.

G. H. Raisoni Educational and Medical Foundation and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Kumar Shubham Bhaskar Annapure, through Father, Shri. Bhaskar Gangaram Annapure Vs Indian Institute of Technology Bombbay, Powai and Ors.

Namdev Bhagwat Sarkunde and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Rural Development and Water Conservation Dept and Ors.