The High Court disposed of the writ petition directed respondents to consider representations of petitioners within four months, relying on a government circular and prior judgments/orders from this Court.
Direction to consider representations within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907 wp 6451.14 as.doc
k
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6451 OF 2014
Namdev s/o Bhagwat Sarkunde & Ors. ... Petitioners. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents.
Mr. V.S. Tadke for the Petitioners. Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for RespondentsState.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : JULY 15, 2014.
P.C. :
Rule, returnable forthwith.
by order dated 6 January 2014 passed in Writ Petition no.33 of 2014 has already directed the concerned Respondent no.3 to decide such representation/s. The same relief can be granted/extended to the Petitioners as they are similarly circumstanced and their grievances are also identical based on the Government Circular dated 24 April 2007. Therefore, we are inclined to dispose of the present petition on similar
1/2
907 wp 6451.14 as.doc
k
lines. Therefore, service to other Respondents is dispensed with. The Petition is taken up for final disposal forthwith.
4 Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned Respondents to consider the representation/s made by the Petitioners in the light of Government Circular dated 24 April 2007 and order dated 29 October 2013 passed by this Court in Writ Petition no.10200 of 2013 and also in the light of the observations made in judgment dated 24 April 2012 in Writ Petition no.7116 of 2012 passed by this Court at Aurangabad Bench, as referred in the orders of this Court. Similar order was passed in Writ Petition no.2077 of 2013 on 3 July 2013 also.
as to costs.
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
katkam
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition should be disposed of similarly to other petitions involving identical grievances regarding representation consideration.
Namdev s/o Bhagwat Sarkunde & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Anoop V. Mohta
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
