Petitioner withdrew the criminal writ petition due to the availability of an efficacious alternative remedy of filing a revision before the Court of Sessions. The petition was accordingly dismissed.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed with liberty to approach the Court of Sessions via revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
District : Aurangabad
Criminal Writ Petition No. 65 of 2014
(Balbhim s/o. Rambhau Devane
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra, through the PI, Police Station, Bhokar, District : Nanded, and another)
Appearances : Mr. G.N. Patil, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. P.N. Muley, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent no.1 - State.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.
DATE : 11TH FEBRUARY 2014
P.C. :
1. Heard.
bgp/criwp65
Balbhim s/o. Rambhau Devane
The State of Maharashtra through the PI, Police Station, Bhokar, District : Nanded
another
Abhay M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
