The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to submit an affidavit explaining delay despite a final extension.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(15)WP-537-13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.537 of 2013
Raghunath Martand Gaikwad through Aarti Sanjay Gaikwad
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Irrigation and ors
.. Respondents
None for the petitioner. Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for the respondent 1 to 3.
CORAM : A.S.OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ
DATED : MARCH 12, 2014.
P.C. :
1 This petition was called out in the morning session and none appeared for the petitioner.
2 During the afternoon session, when the petition is called out, none appears for the petitioner.
3 We find that though time was granted earlier, the petitioner has not filed additional affidavit for explaining the delay. On 4th March 2014, time was extended to file additional affidavit by way of a last chance.
4 Hence, we dismiss the petition for nonprosecution.
(A.A.SAYED, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
1/1
tilak
Raghunath Martand Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
A.S.OKA
A.A.SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
