disposed of a writ petition concerning a representation to the Maharashtra Public Service Commission after respondents undertook to decide within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
923-wp5268.14.sxw
ssm 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5268 OF 2014
Balasaheb Ram Ghodake ….Petitioner. Vs. The Secretary, Maharashtra Public Service Commission & Anr. ….Respondents.
None for the Petitioner. Mr. S.S. Bhende for the Respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 25 JULY 2014.
P.C.:-
The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents makes statement that the Petitioner's representation dated 30 October 2013 shall be decided within one week and necessary orders will be passed accordingly.
2 In view of above, as the substantial prayer is considered, nothing survives in this Petition.
3 The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty. There shall be no order as to costs.
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
1/1
Balasaheb Ram Ghodake
The Secretary, Maharashtra Public Service Commission
Anoop V. Mota
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
