Short order remitting the writ petition back to the Nagpur Bench as Respondent No.6 stood deleted from the proceedings.
Matter remitted to the Nagpur Bench without delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 1
920-wp5104.12.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5104 OF 2012
High Court Bar Association, Nagpur
….Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….Respondents.
Mr. S.M. Puranik for the Petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Datar for Respondent No.6.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 25 JULY 2014.
P.C.:-
Both the learned counsel appearing for the respective
parties make statement that Respondent No.6 stands deleted and therefore, the matter be remitted back to the Nagpur Bench.
2 The matter is accordingly remitted back to the Nagpur
Bench, without delay.
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
1/1
High Court Bar Association, Nagpur
State of Maharashtra
Anoop V. Mohta
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
