Counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted leave and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
5141.13 wp.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5141 OF 2013
Shriniwas s/o. Vitthalrao Chitrak
Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others.
Respondent/s
Mr. S.S. Kulkarni, h/f. Mr. A.G. Kulkarni, advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, AGP for the Respondents.
CORAM : R.M. BORDE
& A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 4TH MARCH, 2014.
PER COURT:
1]Learned counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
2]Leave granted. Petition is disposed of as
withdrawn.
[A.M. BADAR][R.M. BORDE]
JUDGEJUDGE.
grt/-
Shriniwas s/o. Vitthalrao Chitrak
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court