Court rejected the writ petition as infructuous because the authorization for sand excavation issued to respondent no. 4 expired on 30.09.2013. Pending civil application was disposed of.
Writ petition rejected as infructuous; pending civil application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp3049.13
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3049 OF 2013
Grampanchayat, Shelgaon Bk. Tq. Sillod, Dist. Aurangabad.
.. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. V. V. Bhavthankar, advocate for petitioner. Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, AGP for the State. Mr. M. S. Sonawane, advocate for respondent no. 4.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & A. M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 16th APRIL, 2014.
PER COURT :
( A. M. BADAR ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition becomes infructuous due to the expiry of the period prescribed for excavation of sand under the order issued on 31.01.2013.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Grampanchayat, Shelgaon Bk. Tq. Sillod, Dist. Aurangabad
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent no. 4
R.M. BORDE
A. M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
