Petitioner sought leave to withdraw Writ Petition No.5043/2014. The court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition accordingly. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
Leave granted to withdraw; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp5043-14.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5043/2014
Rutuja Kiran Sapkal u/g Kiran Deorao Sapkal .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Mr.A.S.Golegaonkar,Adv.for petitioner Mr.K.G.Patil,AGP for Respondent State
CORAM : R.M.BORDE & V.L.ACHLIYA,JJ. DATED: 23rd June, 2014
PER COURT :-
The counsel for petitioner on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave is granted. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
[V.L.ACHLIYA,J.]
[R.M.BORDE,J.]
umg
Rutuja Kiran Sapkal u/g Kiran Deorao Sapkal
The State of Maharashtra
R.M.BORDE
V.L.ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
