Grievance of petitioners regarding an order of the Education Officer (Secondary) found redressed by a fresh order dated 11.04.2014, hence the writ petition disposed of without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP4442-13
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 4442/2013
(SAHEBRAO VITTHALRAO RAUT & OTHERS VERSUS THE E.O. (SECONDARY), Z.P. WASHIM & ANOTHER)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri P.R. Agrawal, counsel for the petitioners. Shri A.S. Fulzele, A.G.P. for the R-1 & 2. Mrs. Vrushali S. Gordey, counsel for the R-3 & 4. Shri A.J. Gilda, counsel for the Intervenor.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 15, 2014.
Heard.
Shri Agrawal, the learned counsel for the petitioners, states that in view of the order of the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Washim, dated 11.04.2014, tendered by the learned Assistant Government Pleader in the Court, today, the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed.
Since the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed in view of the order of the Education Officer (Secondary), dated 11.04.2014, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
Sahebrao Vitthalrao Raut & Others
The E.O. (Secondary), Z.P. Washim
Another
Vasanti A. Naik
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
